From: Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com>
To: Karl O. Pinc <kop@meme.com>
Cc: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Poor index choice -- multiple indexes of the same
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 03:11:25 +0000
Message-ID: <1119928285l.11411l.4l@mofo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1119926211l.11411l.2l@mofo>
References: <1119913766l.4428l.2l@mofo>
<200506271537.41797.josh@agliodbs.com>
<1119926211l.11411l.2l@mofo>
On 06/27/2005 09:36:51 PM, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> I'm doing this in a torture test script, loading data.
> Every fibnocci number of rows * 100 I VACCUM ANALYZE.
> So, 100, 200, 300, 500, 800, etc.
(And of course disconnect my client and re-connect so
as to use the new statistics. sure would be nice if
I didn't have to do this.)
Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: kop@meme.com, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Poor index choice -- multiple indexes of the same
In-Reply-To: <1119928285l.11411l.4l@mofo>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox