From: mudfoot@rawbw.com
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL?
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:56:33 -0700
Message-ID: <1121334993.42d636d187a3b@webmail.rawbw.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1121322821.6719.0.camel@noodles>
References: <1121322821.6719.0.camel@noodles>
Quoting "Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker@acm.org>:
>
> Here's the result, in transactions per second.
>
> ext3 jfs xfs
> ----------------------
-------
> 10 Clients 55 81 68
> 100 Clients 61 100 64
> ----------------------------
Was fsync true? And have you tried ext2? Legend has it that ext2 is the
fastest thing going for synchronous writes (besides O_DIRECT or raw) because
there's no journal.
>
> -jwb
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mudfoot@rawbw.com
Subject: Re: JFS fastest filesystem for PostgreSQL?
In-Reply-To: <1121334993.42d636d187a3b@webmail.rawbw.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox