pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Benne <markus@m-bass.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: VACUUM FULL vs CLUSTER
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:53:19 -0400
Message-ID: <1127242399.26562.15.camel@host-140.engineering.n-able.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.1.20050920144041.0287c300@pop.puc.cl>
References: <5.2.0.9.1.20050920144041.0287c300@pop.puc.cl>

I have a table that is purged by 25% each night.  I'd like to do a
vacuum nightly after the purge to reclaim the space, but I think I'll
still need to do a vacuum full weekly.

Would there be any benefit to doing a cluster instead of the vacuum?




view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1127242399.26562.15.camel@host-140.engineering.n-able.com>
Permalink:  ../1127242399.26562.15.camel@host-140.engineering.n-able.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1127242399.26562.15.camel@host-140.engineering.n-able.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: markus@m-bass.com
  Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL vs CLUSTER
  In-Reply-To: <1127242399.26562.15.camel@host-140.engineering.n-able.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox