From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>
To: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace@earthlink.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 13:37:36 +0300
Message-ID: <1128595056.8561.32.camel@fuji.krosing.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25154967.1128532864650.JavaMail.root@elwamui-chisos.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <25154967.1128532864650.JavaMail.root@elwamui-chisos.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
On K, 2005-10-05 at 13:21 -0400, Ron Peacetree wrote:
> First I wanted to verify that pg's IO rates were inferior to The Competition.
> Now there's at least an indication that someone else has solved similar
> problems. Existence proofs make some things easier ;-)
>
> Is there any detailed programmer level architectual doc set for pg? I know
> "the best doc is the code",
For postgres it is often "best doc's are in the code, in form of
comments."
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: hannu@skype.net, rjpeace@earthlink.net, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
In-Reply-To: <1128595056.8561.32.camel@fuji.krosing.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox