pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Pål Stenslet <paal.stenslet@exie.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:28:37 +0000
Message-ID: <1134944917.2964.226.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43A5DF23.5010504@paradise.net.nz>
References: <200512170428.jBH4S2W23715@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<1134810953.2964.117.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<8627.1134843222@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1134913732.2964.164.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<43A5DF23.5010504@paradise.net.nz>

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 11:13 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > My understanding: Teradata and DB2 use this.
> 
> FWIW - I think DB2 uses the successive fact RID buildup (i.e method 2), 
> unfortunately 

I think you're right; I was thinking about that point too because DB2
doesn't have index-organised tables (well, sort of: MDC).

I was confused because IBM seem to have a patent on (1), even though it
seems exactly like the original NCR/Teradata implementation, which
predates the patent filing by many years. Wierd.

It's a minefield of patents....

> I haven't got a working copy of DB2 in front of me to test.

True, not all copies work :-)

Best Regards, Simon Riggs




view thread (26+ messages)

Message-ID: <1134944917.2964.226.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Permalink:  ../1134944917.2964.226.camel@localhost.localdomain/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1134944917.2964.226.camel@localhost.localdomain

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, markir@paradise.net.nz, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, paal.stenslet@exie.com
  Subject: Re: Should Oracle outperform PostgreSQL on a complex
  In-Reply-To: <1134944917.2964.226.camel@localhost.localdomain>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox