pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey W. Baker <jwbaker@acm.org>
To: Luke Lonergan <LLonergan@greenplum.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:04:01 -0800
Message-ID: <1138568641.10923.6.camel@noodles> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D023F28D9@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com>
References: <3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D023F28D9@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com>

On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 13:44 -0500, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Depesz,
> 
> > [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of 
> > hubert depesz lubaczewski
> > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 3:25 AM
> >
> > hmm .. do i understand correctly that you're suggesting that 
> > using raid 10 and/or hardware raid adapter might hurt disc 
> > subsystem performance? could you elaborate on the reasons, 
> > please? it's not that i'm against the idea - i'm just curious 
> > as this is very "against-common-sense". and i always found it 
> > interesting when somebody states something that uncommon...

> Oh - and about RAID 10 - for large data work it's more often a waste of
> disk performance-wise compared to RAID 5 these days.  RAID5 will almost
> double the performance on a reasonable number of drives.

I think you might want to be more specific here.  I would agree with you
for data warehousing, decision support, data mining, and similar
read-mostly non-transactional loads.  For transactional loads RAID-5 is,
generally speaking, a disaster due to the read-before-write problem.

While we're on the topic, I just installed another one of those Areca
ARC-1130 controllers with 1GB cache.  It's ludicrously fast: 250MB/sec
burst writes, CPU-limited reads.  I can't recommend them highly enough.

-jwb

PS: Could you look into fixing your mailer?  Your messages sometimes
don't contain In-Reply-To headers, and therefore don't thread properly.




view thread (41+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1138568641.10923.6.camel@noodles>
Permalink:  ../1138568641.10923.6.camel@noodles/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1138568641.10923.6.camel@noodles

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jwbaker@acm.org, LLonergan@greenplum.com
  Subject: Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
  In-Reply-To: <1138568641.10923.6.camel@noodles>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox