From: Jeffrey W. Baker <jwbaker@acm.org>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:03:58 -0800
Message-ID: <1138737838.5648.4.camel@toonses.gghcwest.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C004D7AE.1B5A7%llonergan@greenplum.com>
References: <C004D7AE.1B5A7%llonergan@greenplum.com>
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 09:00 -0800, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Jim,
>
> On 1/30/06 12:25 PM, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:
>
> > Why divide by 2? A good raid controller should be able to send read
> > requests to both drives out of the mirrored set to fully utilize the
> > bandwidth. Of course, that probably won't come into play unless the OS
> > decides that it's going to read-ahead fairly large chunks of the table
> > at a time...
>
> I've not seen one that does, nor would it work in the general case IMO. In
> RAID1 writes are duplicated and reads come from one of the copies. You
> could alternate read service requests to minimize rotational latency, but
> you can't improve bandwidth.
Then you've not seen Linux. Linux does balanced reads on software
mirrors. I'm not sure why you think this can't improve bandwidth. It
does improve streaming bandwidth as long as the platter STR is more than
the bus STR.
-jwb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jwbaker@acm.org
Subject: Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
In-Reply-To: <1138737838.5648.4.camel@toonses.gghcwest.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox