pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
Cc: Jim C. Nasby <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: 1 TB of memory
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:07:08 -0600
Message-ID: <1142633228.1141.7.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b42b73150603171328y940b0e5q3027fd46f6331ad7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20060317173653.GC15742@pervasive.com>
	<C0408037.1F6D6%llonergan@greenplum.com>
	<b42b73150603171328y940b0e5q3027fd46f6331ad7@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 15:28, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 3/17/06, Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com> wrote:
> > > Now what happens as soon as you start doing random I/O? :)
> > If you are accessing 3 rows at a time from among billions, the problem you
> > have is mostly access time - so an SSD might be very good for some OLTP
> > applications.  However - the idea of putting Terabytes of data into an SSD
> > through a thin straw of a channel is silly.
> 
> I'll 'byte' on this..right now the price for gigabyte of ddr ram is
> hovering around 60$/gigabyte.  If you conveniently leave aside the
> problem of making ddr ram fault tolerant vs making disks tolerant, you
> are getting 10 orders of magnitude faster seek time and unlimited
> bandwidth...at least from the physical device.  While SANs are getting
> cheaper they are still fairly expensive  at 1-5$/gigabyte depending on
> various factors.  You can do the same tricks on SSD storage as with
> disks.
> 
> SSD storage is 1-2k$/gigabyte currently, but I think there is huge
> room to maneuver price-wise after the major players recoup their
> investments and market forces kick in.  IMO this process is already in
> play and the next cycle of hardware upgrades in the enterprise will be
> updating critical servers with SSD storage.  Im guessing by as early
> 2010 a significant percentage of enterpise storage will be SSD of some
> flavor.

Now I'm envisioning building something with commodity 1U servers hold 4
to 16 gigs ram, and interconnected with 1g or 10g ethernet.

Open Source SSD via iSCSI with commodity hardware...  hmmm.  sounds like
a useful project.



view thread (21+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1142633228.1141.7.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
Permalink:  ../1142633228.1141.7.camel@state.g2switchworks.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1142633228.1141.7.camel@state.g2switchworks.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, mmoncure@gmail.com, llonergan@greenplum.com, jnasby@pervasive.com
  Subject: Re: 1 TB of memory
  In-Reply-To: <1142633228.1141.7.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox