From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Dan Harris <fbsd@drivefaster.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: vacuum full seems to hang on very small table
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:35:14 +0100
Message-ID: <1144164914.13549.502.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <443289E3.7020801@drivefaster.net>
References: <443289E3.7020801@drivefaster.net>
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 08:59 -0600, Dan Harris wrote:
> I have a table with 1 live row that I found has 115000 dead rows in it (
> from a testing run ). I'm trying to VACUUM FULL the table and it has
> run for over 18 hours without completion. Considering the hardware on
> this box and the fact that performance seems reasonable in all other
> aspects, I'm confused as to why this would happen. The database other
> than this table is quite large ( 70 gigs on disk ) and I would expect to
> take days to complete but I just did 'vacuum full table_stats'. That
> should only do that table, correct? I'm running 8.0.3.
Read this http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/release-8-0-5.html
and you'll probably decide to upgrade.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, fbsd@drivefaster.net
Subject: Re: vacuum full seems to hang on very small table
In-Reply-To: <1144164914.13549.502.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox