From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Cc: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: steve.poe@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:04:18 -0500
Message-ID: <1150304658.26538.12.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388902@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
References: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388902@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:11, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> And how old are the 2600's now?
>
> Anyhoo, I'm not saying the current machines are excellent performers or
> anything, but there are good business reasons to run them if you don't
> need to squeeze out every last pony.
Just thought I'd point you to Dell's forums.
http://forums.us.dell.com/supportforums/board?board.id=pes_linux&page=1
wherein you'll find plenty of folks who have problems with freezing RAID
controllers with 28xx and 18xx machines.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, dpage@vale-housing.co.uk, jd@commandprompt.com, steve.poe@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Which processor runs better for Postgresql?
In-Reply-To: <1150304658.26538.12.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox