From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: nicky <nicky@valuecare.nl>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Speeding up query, Joining 55mil and 43mil records.
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:03:41 -0500
Message-ID: <1150909421.26538.135.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44994DE7.5070801@valuecare.nl>
References: <44994DE7.5070801@valuecare.nl>
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 08:47, nicky wrote:
> Hello People,
SNIPPAGE
> The query above takes around 42 minutes.
>
> However, i also have a wimpy desktop machine with 1gb ram. Windows
> with MSSQL 2000 (default installation), same database structure, same
> indexes, same query, etc and it takes 17 minutes. The big difference
> makes me think that i've made an error with my PostgreSQL
> configuration. I just can't seem to figure it out.
What is the difference between the two plans (i.e. explain on both boxes
and compare)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, nicky@valuecare.nl
Subject: Re: Speeding up query, Joining 55mil and 43mil records.
In-Reply-To: <1150909421.26538.135.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox