From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:36:21 -0400
Message-ID: <11514.1146018981@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8FE57896-2F9B-4838-857B-FA6CC2EE162A@kineticode.com>
References: <FFF901A7-232A-4140-AE41-89ABE7766A85@kineticode.com>
<11055.1146014387@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<8FE57896-2F9B-4838-857B-FA6CC2EE162A@kineticode.com>
David Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> Just on a lark, I tried to get this to work:
> try=# explain analyze EXECUTE foo(1, ARRAY
> [600001,600002,600003,600004,600005,600006,600007]);
> QUERY PLAN
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=26.241..26.251
> rows=1 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 27.512 ms
> (2 rows)
> That's not much use.
It looks like you had something trivial as the definition of foo().
Try one of the actual queries from the plpgsql function.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, david@kineticode.com
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update
In-Reply-To: <11514.1146018981@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox