pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Patrice Beliveau <pbeliveau@avior.ca>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Optimizing queries
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:39:59 -0500
Message-ID: <1155062399.20252.50.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44D8CE92.1080407@avior.ca>
References: <44D8CE92.1080407@avior.ca>

On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 12:49, Patrice Beliveau wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a query that use a function and some column test to select row. 
> It's in the form of:
> 
> SELECT * FROM TABLE
>    WHERE TABLE.COLUMN1=something
>       AND TABLE.COLUMN2=somethingelse
>       AND function(TABLE.COLUMN3,TABLE.COLUMN4) > 0;
> 
> The result of the function does NOT depend only from the table, but also 
> from some other tables.
> 
> Since it's long to process, I've add some output to see what's going on. 
> I find out that the function process every row even if the row should be 
> rejected as per the first or the second condition. Then , my question 
> is: Is there a way to formulate a query that wont do all the check if it 
> does not need to do it ? Meaning that, if condition1 is false then it 
> wont check condition2 and that way the function will only be called when 
> it's really necessary.

What version of postgresql are you running?  It might be better in later
versions.  The standard fix for such things is to use a subquery...

select * from (
   select * from table where 
   col1='something'
   and col2='somethingelse'
) as a
where function(a.col3,a.col4) > 0;



view thread (9+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1155062399.20252.50.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
Permalink:  ../1155062399.20252.50.camel@state.g2switchworks.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1155062399.20252.50.camel@state.g2switchworks.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, pbeliveau@avior.ca
  Subject: Re: Optimizing queries
  In-Reply-To: <1155062399.20252.50.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox