pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Storage Options
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:50:51 -0700
Message-ID: <1156197051.15743.50.camel@dogma.v10.wvs> (raw)

I am trying to decide what kind of storage options to use for a pair of
good database servers, a primary and a read-only that can be a failover.
Here is what I'm thinking so far:

(1) We have a nice NetApp that can do iSCSI. It has a large (multi-GB)
battery-backed cache so it could potentially perform the transactions at
a very high rate. However there are many other applications accessing
the NetApp over NFS, so I am not sure what performance to expect. Any
suggestions about using network storage like this for the database? Will
the database make huge demands on the NetApp, and force my department
spend huge amounts on new NetApp hardware?

(2) I read with interest this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-08/msg00164.php

Is there any consensus on whether to do WAL on a RAID-1 and PGDATA on a
RAID-10 versus everything on a RAID-10? How does the number of disks I
have affect this decision (I will probably have 4-8 disks per server).

Some of the applications I initially need to support will be a high
volume of simple transactions without many tablescans, if that helps.
However, I expect that these servers will need to serve many needs.

Any other suggestions are appreciated. Is there a common place to look
for hardware suggestions (like a postgresql hardware FAQ)?

Regards,
	Jeff Davis




view thread (2+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1156197051.15743.50.camel@dogma.v10.wvs>
Permalink:  ../1156197051.15743.50.camel@dogma.v10.wvs/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1156197051.15743.50.camel@dogma.v10.wvs

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: pgsql@j-davis.com
  Subject: Re: Storage Options
  In-Reply-To: <1156197051.15743.50.camel@dogma.v10.wvs>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox