From: Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Why the difference in plans ??
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 18:05:09 +0200
Message-ID: <1158336309.6071.2.camel@panoramix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24190.1158329315@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <1158309566.30482.29.camel@panoramix>
<24190.1158329315@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 10:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> but it seems there are only 7. Try increasing your statistics target
> and re-analyzing.
Do you mean with "increasing my statistics target" changing the value of
"default_statistics_target = 10" to a bigger number? If so, changing it
to 900 did not make any difference (PostgreSQL restarted, vacuumed
analysed etc).
--
Groeten,
Joost Kraaijeveld
Askesis B.V.
Molukkenstraat 14
6524NB Nijmegen
tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277
fax: 024-3608416
web: www.askesis.nl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: Why the difference in plans ??
In-Reply-To: <1158336309.6071.2.camel@panoramix>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox