pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Bad iostat numbers
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:05:15 -0600
Message-ID: <1165255515.14565.337.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061204174320.GX1622@mathom.us>
References: <PEEPKDFEHHEMKBBFPOOKKEHCDKAA.carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0612032336250.19679@westnet.com>
	<33c6269f0612032317t9f0bc77n3ff791a5cd88fc80@mail.gmail.com>
	<1165249513.14565.329.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
	<33c6269f0612040937l276c5178naecac1983d355e29@mail.gmail.com>
	<20061204174320.GX1622@mathom.us>

On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 11:43, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:37:29PM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> >This discussion I think is important, as I think it would be useful for this
> >list to have a list of RAID cards that _do_ work well under Linux/BSD for
> >people as recommended hardware for Postgresql.   So far, all I can recommend
> >is what I've found to be good, which is 3ware 9500 series cards with 10k
> >SATA drives.  Throughput was great until you reached higher levels of RAID
> >10 (the bonnie++ mark I posted showed write speed is a bit slow).  But that
> >doesn't solve the problem for SCSI.  What cards in the SCSI arena solve the
> >problem optimally?  Why should we settle for sub-optimal performance in SCSI
> >when there are a number of almost optimally performing cards in the SATA
> >world (Areca, 3Ware/AMCC, LSI).
> 
> Well, one factor is to be more precise about what you're looking for; a 
> HBA != RAID controller, and you may be comparing apples and oranges. (If 
> you have an external array with an onboard controller you probably want 
> a simple HBA rather than a RAID controller.)

I think he's been pretty clear.  He's just talking about SCSI based RAID
controllers is all.



view thread (22+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1165255515.14565.337.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
Permalink:  ../1165255515.14565.337.camel@state.g2switchworks.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1165255515.14565.337.camel@state.g2switchworks.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, mstone+postgres@mathom.us
  Subject: Re: Bad iostat numbers
  In-Reply-To: <1165255515.14565.337.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox