pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Haile <jhaile@fastmail.fm>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Partitioning
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:02:01 -0500
Message-ID: <1168524121.14614.1168744439@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B82CFCF@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com>
References: <7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B82CD0A@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com>
	<20070110202006.GU12217@nasby.net>
	<45A54CF5.3090103@myemma.com>
	<7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B82CFCF@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com>

Well - whether or not MySQL's implementation of partitioning has some
deficiency, it sure is a lot easier to set up than PostgreSQL.  And I
don't think there is any technical reason that setting up partitioning
on Postgres couldn't be very easy and still be robust.

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:59:20 +0100, "Mikael Carneholm"
<Mikael.Carneholm@WirelessCar.com> said:
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:47:08PM +0100, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
> > >> Take a look at the set of partitioning functions I wrote shortly
> after
> > >> the 8.1 release:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.studenter.hb.se/~arch/files/part_functions.sql
> > >>
> > >> You could probably work something out using those functions (as-is,
> or
> > >> as inspiration) together with pgAgent
> > >> (http://www.pgadmin.org/docs/1.4/pgagent.html)
> > >>
> > >> /Mikael
> > >>
> > Those are  some great functions.
> > 
> 
> Well, they're less than optimal in one aspect: they add one rule per
> partition, making them unsuitable for OLTP type applications (actually:
> any application where insert performance is crucial). Someone with time
> and/or energy could probably fix that, I guess...patches are welcome :)
> 
> /Mikael
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings



view thread (33+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1168524121.14614.1168744439@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Permalink:  ../1168524121.14614.1168744439@webmail.messagingengine.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1168524121.14614.1168744439@webmail.messagingengine.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: jhaile@fastmail.fm
  Subject: Re: Partitioning
  In-Reply-To: <1168524121.14614.1168744439@webmail.messagingengine.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox