From: Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>
To: Carlos Moreno <moreno_pg@mochima.com>
Cc: postgres performance list <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: compact flash disks?
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:49:07 +0100
Message-ID: <1173282547.9058.36.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45EEDED8.9000804@mochima.com>
References: <HCEPKPMCAJLDGJIBCLGHOEBCHEAA.james@mansionfamily.plus.com>
<E1HOxqf-0005Mn-Uw@elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
<45EEDED8.9000804@mochima.com>
> Or are these Flash disks so slow that they compare to the HD's latency
> figures?
On sequential read speed HDs outperform flash disks... only on random
access the flash disks are better. So if your application is a DW one,
you're very likely better off using HDs.
Cheers,
Csaba.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: nagy@ecircle-ag.com, moreno_pg@mochima.com
Subject: Re: compact flash disks?
In-Reply-To: <1173282547.9058.36.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox