pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ragnar <gnari@hive.is>
To: Gauri Kanekar <meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Nested Loop
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:22:33 +0000
Message-ID: <1174926153.1153.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e4ba9550703260803l16b86ef0w42182ef762837db8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7e4ba9550703260504u6e9402ferd958620c79e9640a@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070326140549.GA9322@winnie.fuhr.org>
	<7e4ba9550703260803l16b86ef0w42182ef762837db8@mail.gmail.com>

On mán, 2007-03-26 at 20:33 +0530, Gauri Kanekar wrote:

you did not show your query, nor did you answer whather you had vacuumed
and analyzed.

> enable_seqscan = off

why this? this is unlikely to help


> 
> QUERY PLAN
> ...
>                                  ->  Nested Loop
> (cost=0.00..1104714.83 rows=6801 width=44) (actual
> time=1820.153..229779.814 rows=10945938 loops=1)

the estimates are way off here. you sure you have analyzed?

gnari

> 




view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1174926153.1153.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Permalink:  ../1174926153.1153.31.camel@localhost.localdomain/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1174926153.1153.31.camel@localhost.localdomain

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: gnari@hive.is, meetgaurikanekar@gmail.com, mike@fuhr.org
  Subject: Re: Nested Loop
  In-Reply-To: <1174926153.1153.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox