From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>
To: Xiaoning Ding <dingxn@cse.ohio-state.edu>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: scalablility problem
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:44:39 -0500
Message-ID: <1175291079.25022.114.camel@state.g2switchworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <460D8371.7080405@cse.ohio-state.edu>
References: <460D7220.9010302@cse.ohio-state.edu>
<23586.1175289138@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<460D8371.7080405@cse.ohio-state.edu>
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:38, Xiaoning Ding wrote:
> Thanks guys,
>
> I update PG to 8.2.3. The results are much better now.
> 1 process : 0.94 second
> 2 processes: 1.32 seconds
> 4 processes: 2.03 seconds
> 8 processes: 2.54 seconds
>
> Do you think they are good enough?
> BTW where can I found some info on what 8.2.3 did to improve
> scalability compared with pre 8.1 versions?
Very nice, eh?
I'd say look through -hackers and -perform to see some of it, but as
usual, the source code is the reference. You'd be surprised how well
commented it is.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: smarlowe@g2switchworks.com, dingxn@cse.ohio-state.edu
Subject: Re: scalablility problem
In-Reply-To: <1175291079.25022.114.camel@state.g2switchworks.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox