From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com>
Cc: Clark Slater <list@slatech.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: faster search
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:49:32 -0400
Message-ID: <11819.1118508572@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42AA3598.4080001@arbash-meinel.com>
References: <20050610132812.R94573@vbp2.vbp2.com>
<42A9D556.7070108@arbash-meinel.com>
<20050610200358.R40688@vbp2.vbp2.com>
<42AA3598.4080001@arbash-meinel.com>
John A Meinel <john@arbash-meinel.com> writes:
> I am a little surprised that it is taking 40s to scan only 400k rows,
> though.
Yeah, that seemed high to me too. Table bloat maybe? It would be
interesting to look at the output of "vacuum verbose test" to see
how much dead space there is.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, john@arbash-meinel.com, list@slatech.com
Subject: Re: faster search
In-Reply-To: <11819.1118508572@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox