pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Pablo Alcaraz <pabloa@laotraesquina.com.ar>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:26:49 +0100
Message-ID: <1193520409.4242.604.camel@ebony.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47225014.5040101@laotraesquina.com.ar>
References: <47225014.5040101@laotraesquina.com.ar>

On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 16:37 -0400, Pablo Alcaraz wrote:

> I executed 2 equivalents queries. The first one uses a union structure. 
> The second uses a partitioned table. The tables are the same with 30 
> millions of rows each one and the returned rows are the same.
> 
> But the union query perform faster than the partitioned query.
> 
> My question is: why? :)

The two queries are equivalent but they have different execution plans.

The UNION query has explicit GROUP BY operations within it. We do not
currently perform a push-down operation onto the individual partitions.
This results in more data copying as well as requiring a single very
large sort, rather than lots of small ones. That is probably enough to
allow it to perform the sort in memory rather than on-disk, thus
allowing a considerable speed-up.

This is on my list of requirements for further partitioning improvements
in 8.4 or beyond.

-- 
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com




view thread (8+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1193520409.4242.604.camel@ebony.site>
Permalink:  ../1193520409.4242.604.camel@ebony.site/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1193520409.4242.604.camel@ebony.site

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: simon@2ndquadrant.com, pabloa@laotraesquina.com.ar
  Subject: Re: Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select from partitioned_table
  In-Reply-To: <1193520409.4242.604.camel@ebony.site>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox