pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: David Jarvis <thangalin@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Analysis Function
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:59:33 -0400
Message-ID: <12072.1276523973@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik5qoLZUtGnakVXIYUTHZoOTYvLlHqBFY-w2GaB@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikihIMleazgqo1NhLo7LA5Tiujz4TIfBL1agxAp@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikZKwBCR8QfGph3aH34A2dJ2NQyOjq-Pt3eZ3_z@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C119B3E.3090608@squeakycode.net>
	<AANLkTinjUmGWmB3jsjj-6w_44c0K7f_wSrH_1TALPaOY@mail.gmail.com>
	<m34ohahrp4.fsf@passepartout.tim-landscheidt.de>
	<AANLkTik3l6uedzVJLqn-nueNva46NAFwxbpSe1XSc26_@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3typ9hl6a.fsf@passepartout.tim-landscheidt.de>
	<AANLkTikPcYh1vMxVynxGnD4RCch8-DMixiGK1v9kO17Z@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim6TrfgLiXM3sTSx6rgXQ3zNLTWBTD_MbU0OPsv@mail.gmail.com>
	<12241.1276287655@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<AANLkTil8w33uYIadqvvecTEvTmY9aNvstpuiy1tryyT7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinPNQZv_9BS1fkoLPXzcBZe8FFv77PBRhPR-GpL@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C14746F.9050603@enterprisedb.com>
	<13998.1276443260@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<AANLkTinUYpgGbtwYvaf01_-6QW6CTxEjaJmceVZg7_wX@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik5qoLZUtGnakVXIYUTHZoOTYvLlHqBFY-w2GaB@mail.gmail.com>

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 21:19, David Jarvis <thangalin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I prefer to_timestamp and to_date over the more verbose construct_timestamp.

> Yeah, I agree with that.

Those names are already taken.  It will cause confusion (of both people
and machines) if you try to overload them with this.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (30+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <12072.1276523973@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../12072.1276523973@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/12072.1276523973@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, magnus@hagander.net, thangalin@gmail.com, heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com
  Subject: Re: Analysis Function
  In-Reply-To: <12072.1276523973@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox