From: Franck Routier <franck.routier@axege.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Does max size of varchar influence index size
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:05:36 +0200
Message-ID: <1214924736.668.22.camel@franck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1214857494.6049.76.camel@localhost>
References: <1214845078.6710.7.camel@franck-laptop>
<1214857494.6049.76.camel@localhost>
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 13:24 -0700, Mark Roberts a écrit :
Hi Mark,
> Is there any particular reason that you're not using a surrogate key?
Well, human readability is the main reason, no standard way to handle
sequences between databases vendors being the second... (and also
problems when copying data between different instances of the database).
So surrogate keys could be a way, and I am considering this, but I'd
rather avoid it :)
Franck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: franck.routier@axege.com
Subject: Re: Does max size of varchar influence index size
In-Reply-To: <1214924736.668.22.camel@franck-laptop>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox