pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kiran Mukhyala <mukhyala.kiran@gene.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: inaccurate stats on large tables
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:21:52 -0700
Message-ID: <1220552512.3853.320.camel@sausalito.gene.com> (raw)

Hello,
        
        I am running a select on a large table with two where
        conditions.
        Explain analyze shows that the estimated number of rows returned
        (190760) is much more than the actual rows returned (58221),
        which is probably the underlying cause for the poor performance
        I am seeing.
        
        Can someone please tell me how to improve the query planner
        estimate? I did try vacuum analyze. Here are some details:
        
        Explain plan:
        unison@csb-test=> explain analyze select * from paliasorigin a
        where
        a.origin_id=20 and a.tax_id=9606;
        
        
        QUERY PLAN
        --------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Bitmap Heap Scan on paliasorigin a  (cost=4901.38..431029.54
        rows=190760 width=118) (actual time=12.447..112.902 rows=58221
        loops=1)
           Recheck Cond: ((origin_id = 20) AND (tax_id = 9606))
           ->  Bitmap Index Scan on paliasorigin_search3_idx
        (cost=0.00..4853.69 rows=190760 width=0) (actual
        time=11.407..11.407
        rows=58221 loops=1)
                 Index Cond: ((origin_id = 20) AND (tax_id = 9606))
        
        Schema:
        unison@csb-test=> \d+ paliasorigin
         Column   |           Type           |
        Modifiers                             |           
        -----------+--------------------------+------------
         palias_id | integer                  | not null
         origin_id | integer                  | not null    
         alias     | text                     | not null
         descr     | text                     |
         tax_id    | integer                  |
         added     | timestamp with time zone | not null default
        timenow()  
        Indexes:
            "palias_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (palias_id)
            "paliasorigin_alias_unique_in_origin_idx" UNIQUE, btree
        (origin_id,
        alias)
            "paliasorigin_alias_casefold_idx" btree (upper(alias))
        CLUSTER
            "paliasorigin_alias_idx" btree (alias)
            "paliasorigin_o_idx" btree (origin_id)
            "paliasorigin_search1_idx" btree (palias_id, origin_id)
            "paliasorigin_search3_idx" btree (origin_id, tax_id,
        palias_id)
            "paliasorigin_tax_id_idx" btree (tax_id)
        Foreign-key constraints:
            "origin_id_exists" FOREIGN KEY (origin_id) REFERENCES
        origin(origin_id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE CASCADE
        Has OIDs: no
        
        
        Number of rows:
        unison@csb-test=> select count(*) from paliasorigin;
          count
        ----------
         37909009
        (1 row)
        
        Pg version:
        unison@csb-test=> select version();
                                                  version
        --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         PostgreSQL 8.3.3 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC
        gcc (GCC)
        4.1.0 (SUSE Linux)
        (1 row)
        
        
        Info from analyze verbose:
        unison@csb-test=> analyze verbose paliasorigin;
        INFO:  analyzing "unison.paliasorigin"
        INFO:  "paliasorigin": scanned 300000 of 692947 pages,
        containing
        16409041 live rows and 0 dead rows; 300000 rows in sample,
        37901986
        estimated total rows
        ANALYZE
        Time: 21999.506 ms
        
        
        Thank you,
        
        -Kiran Mukhyala
        
        




view thread (4+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1220552512.3853.320.camel@sausalito.gene.com>
Permalink:  ../1220552512.3853.320.camel@sausalito.gene.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1220552512.3853.320.camel@sausalito.gene.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: mukhyala.kiran@gene.com
  Subject: Re: inaccurate stats on large tables
  In-Reply-To: <1220552512.3853.320.camel@sausalito.gene.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox