From: Dimi Paun <dimi@lattica.com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Bad performance on simple query
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:07:01 -0500
Message-ID: <1226941621.5760.97.camel@dimi.lattica.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dcc563d10811170853y75b1286fy503d82222b49bf15@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1226937197.5760.89.camel@dimi.lattica.com>
<dcc563d10811170853y75b1286fy503d82222b49bf15@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:53 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> Are you saying it's excessive you need the compound query? Cause
> that's running in 91microseconds as pointed out by Alan.
Of course, my bad. I read that as 91ms (<blush/>).
Confusion came from the fact that pgadminIII reports the query
taking 20-40ms, so I read the 0.091 as seconds not ms.
--
Dimi Paun <dimi@lattica.com>
Lattica, Inc.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: dimi@lattica.com, scott.marlowe@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bad performance on simple query
In-Reply-To: <1226941621.5760.97.camel@dimi.lattica.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox