From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:30:02 +0000
Message-ID: <1237037402.3963.36.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B824DD.7090302@sun.com>
References: <49B824DD.7090302@sun.com>
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:53 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> 1200: 2000: Medium Throughput: -1781969.000 Avg Medium Resp: 0.019
I think you need to iron out bugs in your test script before we put too
much stock into the results generated. Your throughput should not be
negative.
I'd be interested in knowing the number of S and X locks requested, so
we can think about this from first principles. My understanding is that
ratio of S:X is about 10:1. Do you have more exact numbers?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndQuadrant.com, J.K.Shah@Sun.COM
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
In-Reply-To: <1237037402.3963.36.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox