From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Jignesh K. Shah <J.K.Shah@Sun.COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:59:38 +0000
Message-ID: <1237330778.3953.139.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C01900.5030406@sun.com>
References: <49B824DD.7090302@sun.com>
<49B7F470.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>
<29080.1236821556@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<49B87161.10201@sun.com>
<1237225198.3963.60.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant>
<49C01900.5030406@sun.com>
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 17:41 -0400, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
> I did a quick test with patch. Unfortunately it improves my number
> even with default setting 0 (not sure whether I should be pleased or
> sad - Definitely no overhead infact seems to help performance a bit.
> NOTE: Logic is same, implementation is slightly different for default
> set)
OK, I bite. 25% gain from doing nothing??? You're stretching my... err,
credulity.
I like the train of thought for setting 1 and it is worth investigating,
but something feels wrong somewhere.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: simon@2ndQuadrant.com, J.K.Shah@Sun.COM, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov
Subject: Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4
In-Reply-To: <1237330778.3953.139.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox