pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com>
Cc: Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:51:49 -0400
Message-ID: <1240.1217440309@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217436578.6288.44.camel@localhost>
References: <35FABCF85D99464FB00BC5123DC2A70A051D0FB8@s228130hz1ew09.apptix-01.savvis.net>
	<276541.4189.qm@web25805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
	<35FABCF85D99464FB00BC5123DC2A70A051D11E1@s228130hz1ew09.apptix-01.savvis.net>
	<48908988.7020204@emolecules.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0807301656020.4250@aragorn.flymine.org>
	<1217436578.6288.44.camel@localhost>

Mark Roberts <mailing_lists@pandapocket.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:16 +0100, Matthew Wakeling wrote:
>> Anyway, surely it's much safer to just run VACUUM manually?

> Generally, you would think so.  The problem comes from Vacuum blocking
> the application process' writes.

Huh?  Vacuum doesn't block writes.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (23+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1240.1217440309@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1240.1217440309@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1240.1217440309@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mailing_lists@pandapocket.com, matthew@flymine.org
  Subject: Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
  In-Reply-To: <1240.1217440309@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox