From: Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Cc: Ben Chobot <bench@silentmedia.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL - Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:03:28 -0400
Message-ID: <1268831008.4412.1736.camel@bnicholson-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268829058.2137.31.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
References: <1268059301.2098.87.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
<0A41C50D-3F29-4021-A959-95AF955D570F@silentmedia.com>
<1268829058.2137.31.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org>
On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 14:30 +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 09:38 -0800, Ben Chobot wrote:
> > We've enjoyed our FusionIO drives very much. They can do 100k iops
> > without breaking a sweat.
>
> Yeah, performance is excellent. I bet we could get more, but CPU was
> bottleneck in our test, since it was just a demo server :(
Did you test the drive in all three modes? If so, what sort of
differences did you see.
I've been hearing bad things from some folks about the quality of the
FusionIO drives from a durability standpoint. I'm Unsure if this is
vendor specific bias or not, but considering the source (which not
vendor specific), I don't think so.
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: bnichols@ca.afilias.info, devrim@gunduz.org, bench@silentmedia.com
Subject: Re: Testing FusionIO
In-Reply-To: <1268831008.4412.1736.camel@bnicholson-desktop>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox