From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Chris Hoover <revoohc@gmail.com>
Cc: PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:41:18 -0400
Message-ID: <12727.1206070878@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803210330.m2L3U1T28529@momjian.us>
References: <200803210330.m2L3U1T28529@momjian.us>
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Aside from what's said there, I'd note that it's a seriously bad idea
>> to use a "soft mount" or any arrangement wherein it's possible for
>> Postgres to be running while the NFS disk is not mounted.
> Do the docs need updating for this?
Wouldn't be a bad idea to mention it, if we're going to have a section
pointing out NFS risks.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, bruce@momjian.us, revoohc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
In-Reply-To: <12727.1206070878@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox