pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo.romano@notorand.it>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: On Scalability
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:07:18 -0400
Message-ID: <1286463959-sup-8255@alvh.no-ip.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ZorrHqQeeYT1kRUiTFNKdpHqg4StBwLLWG6OT@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=6=WRpND-MXv92D-+iC9AnYDwLsbbXMXj4uNky@mail.gmail.com>
	<1280423526.8613.36.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com>
	<AANLkTikV96eAFxEuqk4k6jadtDomLhnJrwqtEh3mNKs6@mail.gmail.com>
	<1280425184.8613.41.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com>
	<AANLkTim7HQQz=qGfW=xDhx-8HNppYxXF48NjnU2-XiNt@mail.gmail.com>
	<1280427410.8613.44.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com>
	<AANLkTimSGghp4TseAV-zgNYakkyH3J_jW2k8peL7EOTv@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CAD769D.9090301@enterprisedb.com>
	<1286437290.2304.192.camel@ebony>
	<4CAD7BED.4050009@enterprisedb.com>
	<AANLkTi==OD9afGEDOm7OY3KYydLXcMj=kO7M5+QFbaM0@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTiktPBVfa950ntGVDroY8ZNR1npQaA-oPnAJSn7n@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=ZH-bBoXhsMf0Nj9xxmjoTCTj5Sjgk1cR1h-SH@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CADDA06.5070002@2ndquadrant.com>
	<AANLkTi=ZorrHqQeeYT1kRUiTFNKdpHqg4StBwLLWG6OT@mail.gmail.com>

Excerpts from Vincenzo Romano's message of jue oct 07 10:44:34 -0400 2010:

> Do you mean the check constraint is used as plain text to be (somehow) executed?
> If this is the case, then you (all) are perfectly and obviously right
> and I'm just fishing
> for bicycles in the sea.

Yeah, hence this thread hasn't advanced things very much in any useful
direction.  That we need to improve the partitioning implementation is
already known.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support



view thread (45+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1286463959-sup-8255@alvh.no-ip.org>
Permalink:  ../1286463959-sup-8255@alvh.no-ip.org/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1286463959-sup-8255@alvh.no-ip.org

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: alvherre@commandprompt.com, vincenzo.romano@notorand.it, greg@2ndquadrant.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: On Scalability
  In-Reply-To: <1286463959-sup-8255@alvh.no-ip.org>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox