From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Divakar Singh <dpsmails@yahoo.com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:38:52 -0700
Message-ID: <1288031932.8930.32.camel@jd-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <781874.42830.qm@web65413.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
References: <402913.53404.qm@web65405.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
<AANLkTinB1yN0u61EGceCXq6Tjp+RuQ0-JDRp5usZAfWp@mail.gmail.com>
<781874.42830.qm@web65413.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:36 -0700, Divakar Singh wrote:
>
> 68 Rows inserted: 100,000
> Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL
> procedures. But
> performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time
> back so I
> do not have data for that right now.
This is interesting, are you using libpq or libpqXX?
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, dpsmails@yahoo.com, scott.marlowe@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
In-Reply-To: <1288031932.8930.32.camel@jd-desktop>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox