From: dba <dbadbb@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Field wise checking the performance.
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 04:06:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1297685187135-3384348.post@n5.nabble.com> (raw)
I have two identical tables. But the with of the fields are different. Need
to know whether changing from varchar(100) to varchar(30) will increase the
performance, or its just the memory access.
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Field-wise-checking-the-performance-tp3384348p3384348.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: dbadbb@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Field wise checking the performance.
In-Reply-To: <1297685187135-3384348.post@n5.nabble.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox