From: Rishabh Kumar Jain <rishabh.widu@yahoo.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Order of tables
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 22:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1304487058290-4369093.post@n5.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB95E82.20904@enterprisedb.com>
References: <361406.75324.qm@web137010.mail.in.yahoo.com>
<4DB95E82.20904@enterprisedb.com>
Heikki Linnakangas-3 wrote:
>
> On 28.04.2011 12:20, Rishabh Kumar Jain wrote:
>> How the tables must be ordered in the list of tables in from statement?
>
> There is no difference in performance, if that's what you mean. (If not,
> then pgsql-novice or pgsql-sql mailing list would've be more appropriate)
>
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
I understood that now but I have one more query.
In what manner are explicit joins added to improve performence?
Are there some rules for it?
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Order-of-tables-tp4346077p4369093.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: rishabh.widu@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Order of tables
In-Reply-To: <1304487058290-4369093.post@n5.nabble.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox