pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
To: Gael Le Mignot <gael@pilotsystems.net>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Memory usage of auto-vacuum
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 10:33:03 +0200
Message-ID: <1310200383.2101.8.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <plop87tyavncer.fsf@aoskar.kilobug.org>
References: <plop87tyavncer.fsf@aoskar.kilobug.org>

Hi,

On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 09:25 +0200, Gael Le Mignot wrote:
> [...]
> We are running  a PostgreSQL 8.4 database, with  two tables containing a
> lot (> 1 million) moderatly  small rows. It contains some btree indexes,
> and one of the two tables contains a gin full-text index.
> 
> We noticed  that the  autovacuum process  tend to use  a lot  of memory,
> bumping the postgres process near 1Gb while it's running.
> 

Well, it could be its own memory (see maintenance_work_mem), or shared
memory. So, it's hard to say if it's really an issue or not.

BTW, how much memory do you have on this server? what values are used
for shared_buffers and maintenance_work_mem?

> I looked in  the documentations, but I didn't find  the information : do
> you know  how to estimate the  memory required for the  autovacuum if we
> increase the number of rows ? Is it linear ? Logarithmic ? 
> 

It should use up to maintenance_work_mem. Depends on how much memory you
set on this parameter.

> Also, is  there a way  to reduce that  memory usage ?

Reduce maintenance_work_mem. Of course, if you do that, VACUUM could
take a lot longer to execute.

>  Would  running the
> autovacuum more frequently lower its memory usage ?
> 

Yes.


-- 
Guillaume
  http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
  http://www.dalibo.com




view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1310200383.2101.8.camel@laptop>
Permalink:  ../1310200383.2101.8.camel@laptop/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1310200383.2101.8.camel@laptop

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: guillaume@lelarge.info, gael@pilotsystems.net
  Subject: Re: Memory usage of auto-vacuum
  In-Reply-To: <1310200383.2101.8.camel@laptop>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox