pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: hyelluas <helen_yelluas@mcafee.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: How to see memory usage  using explain analyze ?
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1313433154717-4701919.post@n5.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F4C27E77F7A33E4CA98C19A9DC6722A207EBD0C4@EXCHANGE.corp.perceptron.com>
References: <1313184591789-4694681.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<F4C27E77F7A33E4CA98C19A9DC6722A207EBD0C4@EXCHANGE.corp.perceptron.com>

Igor,

thank you , my tests showed better performance against the larger summary
tables when I splited the index for datasource_id & datex , I use to have a
composed index.

Regarding that index statistics - should I analyze the tables? I thought
auto vacuum takes care of it.

helen  

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/How-to-see-memory-usage-using-explain-analyze-tp4694962p4701...
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1313433154717-4701919.post@n5.nabble.com>
Permalink:  ../1313433154717-4701919.post@n5.nabble.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1313433154717-4701919.post@n5.nabble.com

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: helen_yelluas@mcafee.com
  Subject: Re: How to see memory usage  using explain analyze ?
  In-Reply-To: <1313433154717-4701919.post@n5.nabble.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox