From: sgupta <saurabh.b85@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Postgresql Replication Performance
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1325151184846-5107278.post@n5.nabble.com> (raw)
I am doing POC on Posgtresql replication. I am using latest version of
postgresql i.e. 9.1. There are multiple replication solutions avaliable in
the market (PGCluster, Pgpool-II, Slony-I). Postgresql also provide in-built
replication solutions (Streaming replication, Warm Standby and hot standby).
I am confused which solution is best for the financial application for which
I am doing POC. The application will write around 160 million records with
row size of 2.5 KB in database. My questions is for following scenarios
which replication solution will be suitable:
If I would require replication for backup purpose only
If I would require to scale the reads
If I would require High Avaliability and Consistency
Also It will be very helpful if you can share the perfomance or experience
with postgresql replication solutions.
Thanks
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Postgresql-Replication-Performance-tp5107278p5107278.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: saurabh.b85@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Postgresql Replication Performance
In-Reply-To: <1325151184846-5107278.post@n5.nabble.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox