pg.ddx.io pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>
Cc: Harold A. Giménez <harold.gimenez@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:02:08 -0400
Message-ID: <13265.1342731728@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmobkLaBJa5+HG9VsV_MNJGiVEBymio-msdKETZiPk1q36Q@mail.gmail.com >
References: <4FFCCAC4.4030503@ringerc.id.au >
<CAAZKuFZ9tYeC1K5ZayZgztm3re_7ytbsEYFa0wwXirB6Hfm+EQ@mail.gmail.com >
<23853.1342015548@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CAAZKuFYsK+ZQuC=zf0xE=M-LNa02tB7RBy3CHEUyq7LWCkK6jQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CAMkU=1ydaypgAeZxyaMc=KhJJw5riGMBiLpvSqOO42=qArRZmQ@mail.gmail.com >
<32078D4B40DD40ECB739D0ECD7D95996@gmail.com >
<CAMkU=1zJK6WiS9-6eO8rNmRpKSSB4=uw2mTsD=k64mNh__=Dcg@mail.gmail.com >
<CAMkU=1w7vLA63hf-+Uc_j61CvOdKixsOHph9d0H-aLNBYgfX=w@mail.gmail.com >
<CAMkU=1yLXvODRZZ_=fgrEeJfk2tvZPTTD-8n8BwrAhNz_WBT0A@mail.gmail.com >
<19949.1342376967@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmoaTf=zjP37-oG7fr1VbGfuvHSfpajgLZ65EeSJX2mmquA@mail.gmail.com >
<9603.1342454919@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+Tgmoa4ta60Y-rZpEPDRCQKJV8-Uqe0P610Jgj2q7e+fondig@mail.gmail.com >
<11952.1342456591@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmoYRXMWQ_DGmmqu3Zp8oW3Lt-9Lc1q3EHaV_ZmjWqaPkuA@mail.gmail.com >
<2358.1342646246@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmoYg1t3jAOVQLwiCCG6eNcJ8DbVdi_3Vfr=-8-cvxm3zag@mail.gmail.com >
<20408.1342706966@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmoagwPY! G8QO3ykccp4_dpYy_Y_KKzF4QQB <CA+TgmobkLaBJa5+HG9VsV_MNJGiVEBymio-msdKETZiPk1q36Q@mail.gmail.com >
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> What if we change the hash table to have RelFileNode as the key and an
> array of MAX_FORKNUM bitmapsets as the value? Then when you get a
> "forget" request, you can just zap all the sets to empty.
Hm ... the only argument I can really make against that is that there'll
be no way to move such a table into shared memory; but there's probably
little hope of that anyway, given points made upthread. The bitmapset
manipulations are a bit tricky but solvable, and I agree there's
something to be said for not tying this stuff so closely to the
mechanism for relfilenode recycling.
regards, tom lane
view thread (46+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <13265.1342731728@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink: ../13265.1342731728@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/13265.1342731728@sss.pgh.pa.us
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, jeff.janes@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, daniel@heroku.com, ringerc@ringerc.id.au, harold.gimenez@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation
In-Reply-To: <13265.1342731728@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox