pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: robcron <rocron@pssd.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Slower Performance on Postgres 9.1.6 vs 8.2.11
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1351546808698-5729991.post@n5.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFj8pRDqi6tgopU4iAVx-=1ujwSjhKcCNQWRq2jES5ZR5Hp4yA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1351276200087-5729749.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<1901.1351281512@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1351283186158-5729764.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<1351285016309-5729768.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<CAFj8pRDqi6tgopU4iAVx-=1ujwSjhKcCNQWRq2jES5ZR5Hp4yA@mail.gmail.com>

Thank you all for your replies.

I did figure out what is going on.

9.1 is indeed faster than 8.2.11 so we are good to go forward.

Thank you again



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Slower-Performance-on-Postgres-9-1-6-vs-8-2-11-tp5729749p572...
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

view thread (6+ messages)

Message-ID: <1351546808698-5729991.post@n5.nabble.com>
Permalink:  ../1351546808698-5729991.post@n5.nabble.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1351546808698-5729991.post@n5.nabble.com

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: rocron@pssd.com
  Subject: Re: Slower Performance on Postgres 9.1.6 vs 8.2.11
  In-Reply-To: <1351546808698-5729991.post@n5.nabble.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox