pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jugnooken <ken@jugnoo.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: WHERE with ORDER not using the best index
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1391046439075-5789624.post@n5.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9852.1391037355@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <1391030357379-5789581.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<9852.1391037355@sss.pgh.pa.us>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

Thank you so much for the prompt reply, Tom. The index is actually fairly new
- but to be safe I issued REINDEX TABLE so that they are all clean. Here are
the sizes of each index right after REINDEX.

db=> select
pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('index_social_feed_feed_items_on_social_feed_id_and_posted_at'));
 pg_size_pretty
----------------
 149 MB
(1 row)

db=> select
pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size('index_social_feed_feed_items_on_social_feed_id'));
 pg_size_pretty
----------------
 106 MB
(1 row)

Unfortunately, pg still thinks using
index_social_feed_feed_items_on_social_feed_id is faster although they are
about the same size :(. Any idea?

Regards,
Ken



--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/WHERE-with-ORDER-not-using-the-best-index-tp5789581p5789624....
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (4+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1391046439075-5789624.post@n5.nabble.com>
Permalink:  ../1391046439075-5789624.post@n5.nabble.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1391046439075-5789624.post@n5.nabble.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: ken@jugnoo.com
  Subject: Re: WHERE with ORDER not using the best index
  In-Reply-To: <1391046439075-5789624.post@n5.nabble.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox