pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: recently and selectively slow, but very simple, update query....
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 14:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1399326680993-5802555.post@n5.nabble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOfbx2YKcUOMcOxc==rgLOAum5i=4zqhB132Q3QWoVpw04z7cg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOfbx2YKcUOMcOxc==rgLOAum5i=4zqhB132Q3QWoVpw04z7cg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

Stelios Mavromichalis wrote
>> the load of the machine is also low (like 0.2).

Which means little if the update is waiting for a lock to be released by one
other process; which is more likely the situation (or some other concurrency
contention) especially as you said that this particular user generates
significant transaction/query volume (implied by the fact the user has the
most balance updates).

During slow-update executions you want to look at:
pg_stat_activity
pg_locks 

to see what other concurrent activity is taking place.

It is doubtful that dump/restore would have any effect given that the
symptoms are sporadic and we are only talking about a select statement that
returns a single row; and an update that does not hit any indexed column and
therefore benefits from "HOT" optimization.

HTH

David J.






--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Re-recently-and-selectively-slow-but-very-simple-update-quer...
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (6+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1399326680993-5802555.post@n5.nabble.com>
Permalink:  ../1399326680993-5802555.post@n5.nabble.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1399326680993-5802555.post@n5.nabble.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: david.g.johnston@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: recently and selectively slow, but very simple, update query....
  In-Reply-To: <1399326680993-5802555.post@n5.nabble.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox