From: Mel Llaguno <mllaguno@coverity.com>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Anyone have experience using PG on a NetApp All-Flash FAS8000?
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:18:30 +0000
Message-ID: <1426274311117.90132@coverity.com> (raw)
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
The reason I ask is that it seems to support deduplication/compression. I was wondering if this would have any performance implications of PG operations.
Thanks, M.?
Mel Llaguno * Staff Engineer - Team Lead
Office: +1.403.264.9717 x310
www.coverity.com<http://www.coverity.com/; <http://www.coverity.com/; * Twitter: @coverity
Coverity by Synopsys
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: mllaguno@coverity.com
Subject: Re: Anyone have experience using PG on a NetApp All-Flash FAS8000?
In-Reply-To: <1426274311117.90132@coverity.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox