pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Richard Neill <rn214@richardneill.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Why does the query planner use two full indexes, when a dedicated partial index exists?
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:05:18 -0500
Message-ID: <14671.1356627918@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50DC7ABA.5010109@richardneill.org>
References: <50D22DE2.4090301@richardneill.org>
	<28778.1355972790@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<50D3CAC4.3070800@richardneill.org>
	<CAMkU=1w1yqYepDpmKo5fuL9Akkk4t_AOiwoc6u2k5ysfAEt1kQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMkU=1wGV4KZnDbcqdELyaxE4sMvza05KurjA0VH7m9cTn5J_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<50DC7ABA.5010109@richardneill.org>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

Richard Neill <rn214@richardneill.org> writes:
> So, at the moment, I have 3 indexes:
>    full:     parcel_id_code
>    full:     exit_state
>    full:     parcel_id_code where exit state is null

> Am I right that when you suggest just a single, joint index
>      (parcel_id_code,exit_state)
> instead of all 3 of the others,

I think he was just recommending replacing the first and third indexes.

> it will allow me to optimally run all of the following? :
> 1.  SELECT * from tbl_tracker WHERE parcel_id_code=22345 AND exit_state 
> IS NULL
> 2.  SELECT * from tbl_tracker where parcel_id_code=44533
> 3.  SELECT * from tbl_tracker where exit_code = 2

You will need an index with exit_state as the first column to make #3
perform well --- at least, assuming that an index is going to help at
all anyway.  The rule of thumb is that if a query is going to fetch
more than a few percent of a table, an index is not useful because
it's going to be touching most table pages anyway, so a seqscan will
win.  I've forgotten now what you said the stats for exit_code values
other than null were, but it's quite possible that an index is useless
for #3.

These considerations are mostly covered in the manual:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/indexes.html

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (30+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <14671.1356627918@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../14671.1356627918@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/14671.1356627918@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, rn214@richardneill.org
  Subject: Re: Why does the query planner use two full indexes, when a dedicated partial index exists?
  In-Reply-To: <14671.1356627918@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox