pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Job <Job@colliniconsulting.it>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Strong slowdown on huge tables
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:42:42 -0400
Message-ID: <14867.1338313362@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88EF58F000EC4B4684700C2AA3A73D7AA8B1042B83@W2008DC01.ColliniConsulting.lan>
References: <88EF58F000EC4B4684700C2AA3A73D7AA8B1042B83@W2008DC01.ColliniConsulting.lan>

Job <Job@colliniconsulting.it> writes:
> i use PostgreSQL 8.4.8 on Centos 5.x and i have some table where i load with pg_bulkload webtraffic logs, every day.
> After loading new data, i delete with a query 30-days older logs.

Since the deletion pattern is so predictable, you should consider
setting this table up as a partitioned table, so that you can just drop
the oldest partition instead of having to rely on DELETE+VACUUM to
reclaim space.  See
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/ddl-partitioning.html

Alternatively, look into whether including a manual VACUUM in your daily
update script helps any.

			regards, tom lane



view thread (2+ messages)

Message-ID: <14867.1338313362@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../14867.1338313362@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/14867.1338313362@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, Job@colliniconsulting.it
  Subject: Re: Strong slowdown on huge tables
  In-Reply-To: <14867.1338313362@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox