pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:11:59 -0500
Message-ID: <1498.1415646719@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54610C41.4010504@agliodbs.com>
References: <WM!f3d412a8ff9fb2a52f4cfd0f48c225b6122ba5bf1e1523173b5dbc63db143b9cab09ac3f5518a12a19d2507538472d98!@asav-1.01.com>
	<5230B801.90507@agliodbs.com>
	<20130911211253.GF1138556@alap2.anarazel.de>
	<WM!c3606120c0bb347c33db79557781a3bddaeb55ccb41e40a3859a4dc0d258d194010ad0001617c701ce31e795a28cb6ca!@asav-2.01.com>
	<523120E9.6020300@agliodbs.com>
	<24236.1383940000@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1384014645.82057.YahooMailNeo@web162903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<19685.1384307200@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<WM!53245515c260eb3f3ebba35fd7da76a6c4d81274ee6f204f23312f2e9a8487c869ace190beab2dada668e213a6b65dd7!@asav-2.01.com>
	<5283D433.3040406@agliodbs.com>
	<27642.1388512538@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<WM!4667f3cb5dc47231ae35b8e8536208e1377cd80dc7752b6791aae9904e622051fd053c46bc2f2a0a00de258290b6e155!@asav-1.01.com>
	<54610878.3060203@agliodbs.com>
	<CAMkU=1z_LFv9msivo11cH7WEdZ1+WVtbn0wb_YxKDHapYo22cA@mail.gmail.com>
	<WM!8b9334d706cd2687c81bb2579556920dbbbf86d48a79276fb032b1f3067361e0a058faa358b7f794d63fda9d8fd31f27!@asav-3.! 0 1.com>
	<54610C41.4010504@agliodbs.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> On 11/10/2014 10:59 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>> Did this patch every make it in?  Or did it hang waiting for verification?

>> It made it in:
>> commit 4162a55c77cbb54acb4ac442ef3565b813b9d07a
>> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>> Date:   Tue Feb 25 16:04:09 2014 -0500

> Thanks, then the problem I'm seeing now is something else.

Notice that only went in this past Feb., so you need to check you're
dealing with a fairly recent minor release before you dismiss it.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



view thread (43+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <1498.1415646719@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../1498.1415646719@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/1498.1415646719@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, jeff.janes@gmail.com, kgrittn@ymail.com, andres@2ndquadrant.com, andrew@dunslane.net, amit.kapila@huawei.com
  Subject: Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2?
  In-Reply-To: <1498.1415646719@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox