pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Cc: PGSQL Performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 8.4 optimization regression?
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:15:40 -0400
Message-ID: <15708.1314155740@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5331FF.3000900@catalyst.net.nz>
References: <4E5331FF.3000900@catalyst.net.nz>

Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz> writes:
> I am in the progress of an 8.3 to 8.4 upgrade for a customer. I seem to 
> have stumbled upon what looks like a regression. The two databases 
> (8.3.14 and 8.4.8) have identical tuning parameters (where that makes 
> sense) and run on identical hardware. Both databases are regularly 
> vacuumed and analyzed (not by autovacuum), and performing an ANALYZE 
> does not change the plans shown below.

Hmmm ... this is structurally a pretty simple query, so I'm surprised
that 8.3 and 8.4 see it very much differently.  The relation-level
estimates and plan choices are very nearly the same; the only thing
that's changed much is the estimates of the join sizes, and there were
not that many changes in the join selectivity estimation for simple
inner joins.  I wonder whether you are seeing a bad side-effect of this
patch:

http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=7f3eba30

That code would only be reached when one or both join columns lack MCV
lists in pg_stats; if you had analyzed, the only reason for that to be
the case is if the column is unique (or nearly so, in ANALYZE's opinion).

			regards, tom lane



view thread (13+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <15708.1314155740@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../15708.1314155740@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/15708.1314155740@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz
  Subject: Re: 8.4 optimization regression?
  In-Reply-To: <15708.1314155740@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox