From: Glyn Astill <glynastill@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: Henrik <henke@mac.se>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:35:50 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <158561.15546.qm@web25808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0E80D962-22F4-4669-B09F-E1E44449BF76@mac.se>
> >
> >> It feels like there is something fishy going on.
> Maybe the RAID 10
> >> implementation on the PERC/6e is crap?
> >
It's possible. We had a bunch of perc/5i SAS raid cards in our servers that performed quite well in Raid 5 but were shite in Raid 10. I switched them out for Adaptec 5808s and saw a massive improvement in Raid 10.
__________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Cc: glynastill@yahoo.co.uk, gsmith@gregsmith.com, henke@mac.se
Subject: Re: Filesystem benchmarking for pg 8.3.3 server
In-Reply-To: <158561.15546.qm@web25808.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox