pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Adam Alkins <adam.alkins@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Index Choice Problem
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 00:53:04 -0500
Message-ID: <15893.1140241984@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5edd73e0602160903y16a0bd3ao2a0dd817fdf72cc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e5edd73e0602160903y16a0bd3ao2a0dd817fdf72cc@mail.gmail.com>

Adam Alkins <adam.alkins@gmail.com> writes:
> SELECT t.topic_id
> 			FROM phpbb_topics AS t
> 				WHERE t.forum_id = 71
> 					AND t.topic_id NOT IN (205026, 29046, 144569, 59780, 187424,
> 138635, 184973, 170551, 22419, 181690, 197254, 205130)
> 						ORDER BY t.topic_last_post_time DESC
> 							LIMIT 23 OFFSET 0

If you're using 8.1, you'd probably find that an index on (forum_id,
topic_last_post_time) would work nicely for this.  You could use it
in prior versions too, but you'd have to spell the ORDER BY rather
strangely:
	ORDER BY forum_id desc, topic_last_post_time desc
The reason for this trickery is to get the planner to realize that
the index order matches the ORDER BY ...

			regards, tom lane



view thread (4+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <15893.1140241984@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../15893.1140241984@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/15893.1140241984@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, adam.alkins@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Index Choice Problem
  In-Reply-To: <15893.1140241984@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox