pg.ddx.io  pgsql-performance@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Nicolas PARIS <nicolas.paris@riseup.net>
To: pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: tablespace to benefit from ssd ?
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 11:48:38 +0100
Message-ID: <167f5d4ec9c3cc46c78300d3db323e0b38883a67.camel@cybertec.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ftf7fari.fsf@riseup.net>
References: <87ftf7fari.fsf@riseup.net>

On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 05:42 +0100, Nicolas PARIS wrote:
> I have both hdd and ssd disk on the postgres server. The cluster is
> right now created on the hdd only. I am considering using a tablespace
> to put some highly used postgres object on the ssd disk. Of course the
> ssd is small compared to the hdd, and I need to choose carefully what
> objects are stored on that side.
> 
> I am wondering what kind of object (indexes, data) would benefit from
> ssd. The database primary/foreign keys are highly used and there is
> almost no sequencial scan. However the server has a large amount of ram
> memory and I suspect all of those indexes are already cached in ram.
> 
> I have read that tablespaces introduce overhead of maintenance and
> introduce complication for replication. But on the other hand I have
> this ssd disk ready for something.
> 
> Any recommandation ?

Put "pg_stat_statements" into "shared_preload_libraries" and restart the server.

Set "track_io_timing" to on.

Let your workload run for at least a day.

Install the "pg_stat_statements" extension and run

  SELECT blk_read_time, query
  FROM pg_stat_statements
  ORDER BY blk_read_time DESC LIMIT 20;

That will give you the 20 queries that spent the most time reading from I/O.

Examine those queries with EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) and see which tables or
indexes cause the I/O.

Then you have a list of candidates for the fast tablespace.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
-- 
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com






view thread (5+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <167f5d4ec9c3cc46c78300d3db323e0b38883a67.camel@cybertec.at>
Permalink:  ../167f5d4ec9c3cc46c78300d3db323e0b38883a67.camel@cybertec.at/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/167f5d4ec9c3cc46c78300d3db323e0b38883a67.camel@cybertec.at

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
  Cc: laurenz.albe@cybertec.at, nicolas.paris@riseup.net, pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: tablespace to benefit from ssd ?
  In-Reply-To: <167f5d4ec9c3cc46c78300d3db323e0b38883a67.camel@cybertec.at>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox